Формула, естественно есть, например
, связь линейная - уменьшение значения Объемного КПД пропорционально уменьшает значение расхода. Ну то есть можно попробовать установить 80 * 10,21 / 11,41 = 72Спасибо!
Формула, естественно есть, например
, связь линейная - уменьшение значения Объемного КПД пропорционально уменьшает значение расхода. Ну то есть можно попробовать установить 80 * 10,21 / 11,41 = 72Спасибо!
Hi, I’m new at this forum and would like to know if OBD2 devices like Elm327 are able to send the car alarm to OBD Car Doctor app. So, instead of car alarm making noise, the car alarm is redirected to the smartphone.
Any links to learn more about this specific topic?Thanks!
а как может быть, что телефон подключается к obd2 eml 327 и считывает все параметры, а через магнитолу андроид 5,1,1 нет...
Hello, what about the OBD2 in ebay at the range of 15-20USD? They usually say: KW902, KW903, and there are some cheap vGate. They are also wifi.
Like these:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/222201867842
http://www.ebay.com/itm/152002399779
http://www.ebay.com/itm/131665954601
Some of them have the same packaging but they seem different brand. Is it possible to have the
vgate or KW packaging and the PCB inside would be the cheapest Chinese ones?
Thank you
Hello all.
I include myself on the list. I bought the Blue ELM327 V2.1 Bluetooth connector for my 2003 CR-V on the Dominican Republic.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ELM327-Mini-V2-1-OBD2-OBD-Bluetooth-Auto-Car-Scanner-Diagnostic-Tool-for-Android-/262624658939?hash=item3d25a645fb:g:TBwAAOSw3xJVaC87
In my case is not fare to say that the tool doesn't work at all. In fact it does connects to smartphone: LG G3 VS-985 and I'm even also capable to connect to some vehicles: 2011 Rav-4, 2013 Kia Rio, 2013 Kia K7 and other. But the one reason I need it no connect doesn't work: My CR-V.
In the link above you may find image of the item. Shortly I'll oist a picture of the chipset (IC).
Купил на Али адаптер (ELM327 v.2.1) протестировал на Матизе, Сандере и Шевроле - Работает нормально.

A lot of people on here seemed to have negative experiences with clones ... I bought the Kiwi 3 OBD2 car to smartphone adapter from PLX's website a few months back and it has been working great– I just leave it plugged in and it autoconnects every time I enter my car. A little pricey but IMHO well worth the cost.
I spent $10 USD for both but these adapters aren't worth even that purchase. Like you mentioned, INCARDOC, the official ELM chipset is much, much better overall. Spending the extra money to purchase a quality adapter is the best option in my opinion. The bluetooth connection drops out quite often on the adapter I posted above. But also, Bluetooth has been a very poor wireless connection for every device I use it for. Even the data transfer rates lack between every device i use it on. I also find that Windows is lacking in both driver and software support for Bluetooth. However, I have a quality USB OBD2 adapter that I use on my Windows PC and it is the best ELM327 device I have used till this day. I use the micro USB host adapter for that when running on Android and it seems to respond much quicker when recieving data from the vehicle.
I purchased 2 "budget" bluetooth OBD2 adapters which I have been disappointed with. I originally read this post about 6 months ago when I was having problems just after receiving them. I have tested these adapters out on at least 6 different vehicles. The only vehicle I have gotten both adapters to work on was a 2002 Kia Sportage (Hyundai). And with all software functionality. I am wondering if in particular parts of Asia where these are manufactured that they are using a different type of OBD2 compatibility than what our made-for-America vehicles are using? I don't have enough experience in that department to really know. I've had this adapter connect to every PC and mobile device via Bluetooth fine but when the ELM327 software is attempting to use all the protocols available, it is unable to connect to a Ford, Chrysler, or Chevrolet vehicle.
My adapters MAC address does not match the defective MAC listed in the original post.
Here's a few photos of my adapter(s). I did a quick tear down of the device. I compared the adapter teeth to my OBD2 scanner cable connector (which connects fine). The teeth in this adapter appear to be more recessed. They are also soldered in at such different lengths that perhaps there is a bad connection to the ECM when plugged in to most vehicles? Just a thought for those that have no functionality on their faulty or perhaps intentionally faulty Bluetooth adapters.






Update:
I took a look at the diagrams for the OBD2 pin configurations on typical OBD2 connectors. If anyone is interested, this unit is lacking pin #2 (J1850 Bus +) and pin #10 (J1850 Bus). It looks like several pins on OBD2 connectors are left for manufacturer specific features. This unit does not have any of those additional pins, as well as support for J1850, (assuming that I read the pin diagram properly). But if you read the case on the adapter, it "supports all OBD2 protocols"! SAE J1850 is listed as being used "mainly by US manufacturers". My assumption over these cheap adapters is that they were manufactured for the Asian or European vehicles in mind, hence the lack of the J1850 bus pins.
The pins that are present on my adapters; 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14, 15, and 16. Here's a chart for the OBD2 pin out configuration if you feel the need to pull your adapter apart to see what bus it supports. This is the car side of the adapter so you'll have to look at your pins in reverse.

You can see reviews of OBD2 scanner to choose best OBD2 scanner at here
mbaxter
2
Roman Lach
2
scottnewport1963
2
Rayz News
2
stanleytorphy
2
rory.turner
2
Asror Zakirov
2
enimahendrb45
2
d1960gill
2
jtnickels1
2